Stop calling the Super Productionizer a 'baby blender' – Frank Elavsky
Key takeaways
- I’m writing a firm defense of the the Super Productionizer (SP™).
- Stop calling Super Productionizer™ (SP™) “the baby blender!” It doesn’t currently blend babies, according to the latest report by Good Corporation (GC).
- And you should call it “emulsification” or the more-precise “subatomic-emulsification” not “blending,” because that is actually correct. “Blending” babies makes it seem so sensationalized.
I’m writing a firm defense of the the Super Productionizer (SP™). I’m sick of the baseless, meaningless, self-serving critiques I keep hearing online by “influencers” who only care about their followers and social media popularity.
Stop calling Super Productionizer™ (SP™) “the baby blender!” It doesn’t currently blend babies, according to the latest report by Good Corporation (GC). Yes, SP™ has already “blended” babies, but we can’t do anything about that now. So we can’t stop the subatomic-emulsification process, since it already started.
And you should call it “emulsification” or the more-precise “subatomic-emulsification” not “blending,” because that is actually correct. “Blending” babies makes it seem so sensationalized. Plus, murder (by blending) is obviously illegal. But subatomic-emulsification is what we all do all the time, every day. Our brains and bodies are constantly performing microscopic, small-scale forms of subatomic-emulsification all the time. Just because SP™ performs subatomic-emulsification way faster and more efficiently than we do on our bodies doesn’t mean it is “murder” or “illegal.” Law and policy has nothing stopping Good Corp from continuing to scale subatomic-emulsification.