Contributor: How the American experiment could last another 250 years

7 min Click here to listen to this article Share via Close extra sharing options Email Facebook X LinkedIn Threads Reddit WhatsApp Copy Link URL Copied! Print 0:00 0:00 1x This is read by an automated voice. Please report any issues or inconsistencies here. See more from the L.A. Times in Google Search. Set us as preferred America has accomplished amazing things in the first 250 years of its nationhood. It went from being a peripheral colony to being the richest and most powerful country in the world. We are the nation of Midwestern corn and wheat fields, the automobile, the personal computer, the internet, Hollywood, television, jazz, rock ‘n’ roll, rap, social media, fast food and blue jeans. We are prosperous, influential and a military superpower. However, being a great nation does not mean staying a great nation forever. Empires fall. Superpowers fail. America is at a historical juncture. Can it do what it takes to give itself another 250 years? To improve its odds, the U.S. could draw on lessons from history — in particular, the stories of three nations that self-destructed. There is no place called Byzantium today. In its prime, from AD 813 to 1045, Byzantium was a vast empire running from Sicily and southern Italy through the Balkans to all of Turkey. Between AD 718 and 1453, Byzantium always controlled some share of this region. Byzantium was technologically advanced. Its literacy rate was higher than that of 18th century France. Byzantines built aqueducts, designed clocks, wove magnificent silks and made the world’s greatest mosaics. The empire was fabulously wealthy. One emperor, Basil II, wrecked all this. He did this by giving massive tax breaks to the rich. Byzantium was under constant threat from geopolitical enemies. To survive, it had to be able to regularly raise armies. After the tax break, Byzantine emperors found that they no longer had the funds to do so. Before Basil II were an uninterrupted string of military victories; after, a series of losses. The empire weakened until it finally fell to the Ottomans. Basil II’s tax breaks for the rich led to deficits, insolvency and government nonperformance. If rich countries always get richer and poor countries always fall behind, Spain should be the world’s dominant power today. In 1500, Spain was an economic and military juggernaut. Its crucial asset was New World silver. Mexican and Peruvian silver represented more specie than was available in all the rest of Europe. Had Spain invested these proceeds in rational economic activity, the Industrial Revolution would have happened in Spain rather than Britain. Spain killed its own economy by promoting extreme social inequality. The landed aristocrats of Spain wanted complete economic and political domination of the country. The aristocracy’s control of the government meant they could cut off all market competition to their businesses. With no competition from agricultural imports, the Spanish lords had no incentive to improve their agricultural efficiency. The other nations of Western Europe improved farming between 1500 and 1800. Spain stayed locked in place. The nobility did not want merchants to compete with them for political power and so shut down merchants who favored reform. Businessmen seeking market freedom fought no fewer than four civil wars trying to remove the aristocracy’s stifling of economic life. A fifth civil war was an attempt by workers to reduce social inequality. The aristocrats won all five of these wars. The bloodshed was horrendous. The economic losses were catastrophic. Inequality stifled Spain’s ability to industrialize by killing the size of its domestic market. England and the U.S. were less unequal, with domestic markets thanks to working classes with money to spend. Spain’s impoverished peasants could buy nothing. Entrepreneurship died. Spain stagnated. Thus, after 1600, Spain continuously fell behind the rest of Western Europe. In 1600, it was the world’s richest nation. By 1900, Spain was poorer than Argentina and Venezuela. Britain’s fall is not as dramatic as that of Byzantium and Spain. The United Kingdom still has a high standard of living. But in the Victorian era, Britain was the unquestioned dominant power. Its power came from superior technology. The Industrial Revolution was British. Britain invented the steam engine, mechanized spinning and weaving, the railroad and the telegraph. The rest of the world strained to catch up with British technology. A century later, that lead was gone. The dominant technological powers were the U.S. and Germany; their universities taught math, science and engineering. American and German engineering became the best in the world. Britain sent fewer of its children to university than did its two economic rivals. Oxford and Cambridge were finishing schools for aristocratic gentlemen. The universities added mathematics and science to their curricula only reluctantly. Doing research in those areas was conside

Contributor: How the American experiment could last another 250 years

Key takeaways

More in local