Australians have a lot in common with the Pope when it comes to AI

Pope Leo XIV has urged global governments to slow down the development of AI systems and their disruptive effects. (Reuters: Remo Casilli) Link copiedShareShare articleIt's not often that the Pope, college students and Australians agree. One topic that has put these unusual bedfellows all roughly on the same page is artificial intelligence. Last week, Pope Leo XIV published his first encyclical, a 43,000-word plea to address the threats posed by AI. American college students have been expressing their concerns by booing esteemed commencement speakers who mention the new technology (the exception that proves the rule was Australian comedian Ronny Chieng who was greeted with cheers for his message "F*** AI" at a Harvard ceremony). It's not just a set of outlier students and pontiffs, either. Most Australians do not have particularly fond feelings towards the new technology, polling shows. Australians have the equal most negative views towards AI in the world, according to an EY survey of people from 23 countries. Almost half of Australians surveyed for the Minderoo Foundation say the risks outweigh the benefits, compared with about a third who believe the opposite. Only 4 per cent of Australians say they trust their private information with AI companies, according to a new survey done by Australia's Office of the Information Commissioner. Research from the Tech Policy Design Institute found that just 1 per cent of Australians say they have complete trust that AI will be used responsibly. This feeling is manifesting in real world politics. Just a few years ago, the construction of data centres being used to serve AI and other tech services was mostly uncontroversial and rarely newsworthy. Pope Leo XIV urges global governments to slow down the development of AI systems and their disruptive effects. Now, residents from places like Lane Cove in Sydney and West Fitzroy in Melbourne are opposing building "AI factories" in their areas. Last month, a developer pulled a proposal to build a data centre near Perth, citing community opposition. It's a big enough problem that this week, Assistant Minister Andrew Charlton warned that Australia would face a US-style anti-AI backlash unless it kept Australians safe from the harms of AI. So, why do Australians dislike and distrust this new technology so much? After all, it's hard to imagine crowds cheering or a pope pontificating about another form of computing like this. (Although I would personally love to hear the bishop of Rome share his thoughts on the most promising approach in quantum computing.) On paper, AI sounds like it should be popular. Its proponents predict that it will make us all richer, more capable and freer from drudgery thanks to the automation of boring tasks. One school of thought is that the AI backlash is the predictable and typical response to any technology promoted as being transformative and disruptive. This growing antipathy towards AI is an issue one Australian industry group representing tech companies called for the government to run a public campaign to "improve digital literacy and counter misinformation". While many Australians may not be as immersed in AI as its makers and promoters, there's a big factor other than what Australians aren't hearing about AI. Last month, the chief of global bank Standard Chartered said that AI would replace "lower-value human capital". That's human beings. Microsoft's AI chief said most tasks done by white collar workers will be automated within the next 12-18 months. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei predicted 50 per cent of white-collar jobs would be eliminated in five years and push unemployment to 10-20 per cent. Some of this is AI leaders warning about the consequences of AI replacing human work, but it's also part of the marketing pitch, too. For all the predictions made by the AI companies and the government about economy-wide productivity boosts or helping businesses cut costs, most working people rely on jobs. A philosopher and Royal Australian Air Force reservist has been chosen to lead the federal government's efforts to keep Australians safe from AI. What those people are hearing is that AI might make them more efficient, but it also might make their role redundant. (Evidence of AI affecting Australian employment across the economy remains fairly weak, but it is early days.) Another issue are the existential risks associated with the technology. Whether it's the fear that a rogue AI will go Skynet and destroy our systems or that it'll be used to create synthetic bioweapons, these potential downsides are another reason to dislike the technology. There's also the immense amount of hype surrounding AI. Bill Simpson-Young is a former CSIRO researcher who left to set up the Gradient Institute, an Australian not-for-profit dedicated to promote the safe use of AI. He reckons it's obvious why Australians don't trust AI: "It's because they've got bullshit detectors." Simpson-Young sa

Australians have a lot in common with the Pope when it comes to AI

Key takeaways

More in international