‘FOMO has proven a stronger incentive than poor stock performance’: Goldman Sachs just issued a brutal verdict on the AI boom

The numbers coming out of Wall Street’s most influential research shop tell a story that Silicon Valley would rather not hear. In two separate reports published last month, Goldman Sachs analysts examined the great AI infrastructure build-out from opposite ends of the telescope — one team studying how much the machine will cost to build, another studying whether the machine is actually working — and arrived at a rare institutional moment: two wings of a single firm arguing, simultaneously, that the machine costs more than anyone knows and produces less than anyone admits. Notably, it is not the first time Goldman has said something like this. James Covello, the firm’s head of global equity research, has been one of Wall Street’s most prominent and consistent AI skeptics since he co-authored the original “Too Much Spend, Too Little Benefit?” report in June 2024 — a piece that landed like a thunderclap precisely because it came from inside one of the institutions most deeply enmeshed in financing the boom it was questioning. Goldman advises hyperscalers, underwrites chip company offerings, and sits at the table with the companies building the very infrastructure Covello was interrogating. Two years later, Covello is back with an update. He was wrong about some things, he acknowledges. But on the central question — whether the spending is producing commensurate returns — he has only gotten more convinced. Trillion-dollar bill Start with the cost. The Goldman Sachs Global Institute, in a report titled “Tracking Trillions,” projects roughly $7.6 trillion in cumulative AI capital expenditure between 2026 and 2031 — covering chips, data centers, and power infrastructure. Annual spending is expected to more than double over that period, from $765 billion this year to $1.6 trillion by 2031. Those figures, the report is careful to note, are not forecasts. They are baseline estimates — and extremely sensitive ones at that. Change a sin