Scoopfeeds — Intelligent news, curated.
As food shocks spread, citizens are showing more leadership than governments
environment

As food shocks spread, citizens are showing more leadership than governments

Climate Home News · Jul 3, 2026, 10:16 AM

Why this matters: environmental and climate reporting with long-term consequences.

Rich Wilson is CEO of the Iswe Foundation and co-founder of the Global Citizens’ Assembly. The numbers are stark. According to the 2026 Global Report on Food Crises, 266 million people across 47 countries experienced high levels of acute food insecurity last year, nearly double the figure recorded a decade ago. Meanwhile, disruptions to oil, gas and fertiliser flows through the Strait of Hormuz drove a 46% month-on-month spike in urea prices early this year, sending agricultural price indices up 8% and raising the spectre of a global affordability crisis. This is not a blip. It is a new baseline. The EAT-Lancet Commission concluded that food systems now account for roughly 30% of total greenhouse gas emissions and are the largest single contributor to the climate crisis. The science has been clear for years. Now some of the solutions to the problem are becoming socially acceptable too. Jul 3, 2026 Finance Billions unlocked as Green Climate Fund agrees to spend more and save less The board of the UN’s flagship climate fund has agreed to allowed management to invest more of its money in projects in developing nations and keep less in reserve Read more Jul 1, 2026 Energy Can giant batteries unlock Africa’s green industrial future? Battery energy storage systems (BESS) could drive clean tech manufacturing in Africa but shortfalls in finance and data are still limiting deployment at scale Read more Earlier this year, people from more than 60 countries and territories, selected not by vested interest, but by lottery, spent seven weeks examining the evidence on food and climate for the latest Global Citizens’ Assembly. They heard from scientists, farmers and industry. They worked through 42 hours of structured deliberation, engaging with some difficult trade-offs. They were not asked to endorse a predetermined conclusion. They were asked an open question: what changes, if any, should we make to how we grow, share and eat food, so that everyone has enough

Article preview — originally published by Climate Home News. Full story at the source.
Read full story on Climate Home News → More top stories
Aggregated and edited by the Scoop newsroom. We surface news from Climate Home News alongside other reporting so you can compare coverage in one place. Editorial policy · Corrections · About Scoop