Supreme Court strengthens Trump’s firing power at independent agencies
Key takeaways
- It formally overturns the high court s 1935 landmark decision, Humphrey s Executor v.
- If anything more is left of Humphrey s, we overrule it, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the majority.
- Beyond the FTC, the decision stands to impact roughly two dozen multimember agencies across the government, allowing a president to install appointees who fit his political mold.
Why this matters: political developments that affect policy direction and public trust.
Link copied by Zach Schonfeld - 06/29/26 10:22 AM ET Link copied NOW PLAYING The Supreme Court strengthened President Trump s control over independent agencies in a 6-3 decision along ideological lines, overruling 91 years of precedent that allowed Congress to insulate certain executive branch officials with firing protections.
In an expansion of presidential power, the ruling gives Trump the right to sack Federal Trade Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter, a Democratic appointee who took center stage in his quest to set aside constraints on his removal authority.
It formally overturns the high court s 1935 landmark decision, Humphrey s Executor v. United States, which laid the groundwork for certain agencies across the executive branch to enjoy a degree of independence from the White House. These agencies regulate vast swaths of American life, including labor disputes, federal employee rights, workplace discrimination, credit unions, product recalls, plane accidents and more.