Anmol Pinky’s ex-Husband DSP faces FIR in Illegal Raid Case
Why this matters: local context for readers following news across Pakistan and the region.
LAHORE – Anmol Pinky’s ex-husband, former DSP Rana Muhammad Akram, has come under legal scrutiny after the Lahore Sessions Court ordered registration of an FIR against him in a case involving an alleged illegal raid and property seizure worth millions of rupees. The court stepped in after conflicting departmental inquiries failed to settle the matter, directing that a formal criminal investigation now be carried out. Lahore Sessions Court ordered registration of FIR against former DSP Organized Crime Unit and ex-Inspector Rana Muhammad Akram in connection with allegations of an illegal raid and unlawful seizure of property. The order came on a petition filed by Yasmin Tabassum, also known as Nigar Chaudhry, under Sections 22A and 22B of Criminal Procedure Code. The court directed the SHO concerned to register a case and proceed with the investigation according to law. The complainant alleged that Rana Akram conducted a forceful and unauthorised raid at a house, during which property worth around Rs5.5 million was taken away. The accusations also include illegal entry into a residence, wrongful detention, and other cognizable offences. A previous inquiry conducted by the CCPO office held the officer responsible for misconduct and improper behaviour, adding weight to the allegations. The matter has already gone through multiple departmental inquiries with differing outcomes. An internal report by the SSP Internal Accountability on August 5, 2024 pointed to serious irregularities in the raid. However, a later inquiry by the Organized Crime Unit concluded that the allegations could not be proved, creating confusion and disagreement within the investigation process. Because of these conflicting findings, the complainant challenged the reports, leading to further legal proceedings. In July 2025, AIG Inspection and AIG Complaints ordered a de novo inquiry, meaning the case was to be investigated again from the beginning to ensure clarity and fairness. The court was also in