business
U.S. would only break Iranian ceasefire if there was ‘absolutely no alternative,’ says Deutsche Bank—this weekend was a warning shot
Key takeaways
- A year ago, U.S. strikes against Iran would have had analysts running for the hills.
- On Monday, the U.S. military carried out action near the Strait of Hormuz, claiming self-defense rather than signaling an end to the ceasefire.
- Despite the potential knock to negotiations, economists remained relatively sanguine this morning.
A year ago, U.S. strikes against Iran would have had analysts running for the hills. In 2026, they’re barely raising an eyebrow.
On Monday, the U.S. military carried out action near the Strait of Hormuz, claiming self-defense rather than signaling an end to the ceasefire. In response, NBC News reported Iran’s Revolutionary Guard vowed today to “respond decisively to any violation of the ceasefire.”
Despite the potential knock to negotiations, economists remained relatively sanguine this morning. ”The market looks minded to continue pricing de-escalation in the Middle East – notwithstanding some occasional surgical strikes from the U.S.,” wrote ING’s Chris Turner.
Article preview — originally published by Fortune. Full story at the source.
Read full story on Fortune →
More top stories
Also covered by
Aggregated and edited by the Scoop newsroom. We surface news from Fortune alongside other reporting so you can compare coverage in one place.
Editorial policy · Corrections · About Scoop