Weaponizing passports won't help American kids
Key takeaways
- Revocations began May 8 for passport holders who owe $100,000 or more and will soon affect those who owe more than $2,500 in unpaid child support.
- Predictably, some are celebrating this move as cracking down on deadbeats.
- But a politically motivated caricature does not justify doubling down on a counterproductive and outdated approach to child support policy.
Why this matters: political developments that affect policy direction and public trust.
Revocations began May 8 for passport holders who owe $100,000 or more and will soon affect those who owe more than $2,500 in unpaid child support. A vast number of American parents, overwhelmingly fathers, are poised to lose a vital document that is used not only for travel but also as proof of identity and citizenship.
Predictably, some are celebrating this move as cracking down on deadbeats. The image of a man booking an overseas flight while choosing to evade his legal and moral responsibility to provide for his children offers a compelling pretext for expanded federal child support enforcement. We have been primed for this over decades of casting noncustodial fathers — particularly Black and low-income fathers — as absentee villains.
But a politically motivated caricature does not justify doubling down on a counterproductive and outdated approach to child support policy.