SHC seeks details from Sindh health secretary, police chief on reports of HIV outbreak at Karachi hospital

KARACHI: The Sindh High Court (SHC) sought on Thursday a detailed report from the provincial health secretary and police chief after a citizen filed a petition, citing reports of an HIV outbreak allegedly resulting from the reuse of contaminated syringes and medical negligence at a Karachi hospital. The petition, filed by Tariq Mansoor, was taken up by a two-member SHC bench comprising Justice Adnanul Karim Memon and Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry. In its written order, seen by Dawn, the bench noted that the plea arose from “the reported HIV outbreak at Kulsum Bai Valika SESSI Hospital, SITE, Karachi, allegedly caused by the reuse of contaminated syringes and gross medical negligence, resulting in the infection of approximately 84 to over 200 children, with several reported fatalities”. The order noted that the medical facility was a “public hospital functioning under the Sindh Employees Social Security Institution (SESSI) and was “responsible for providing medical facilities to insured workers and their dependents”. “The hospital caters to a large number of patients daily and owes a statutory duty to provide safe and adequate medical treatment,” the SHC bench stressed. The petitioner contended that “despite repeated reports in the national media regarding the HIV outbreak, no transparent, independent or time-bound inquiry has been conducted to fix responsibility upon the officials and medical staff allegedly involved”, according to the order. It added that the petitioner had served a “legal notice upon the concerned authorities demanding an independent inquiry, registration of criminal proceedings, disclosure of the inquiry report, screening and treatment of affected children, and compensation to the victims”. However, “no effective action has been taken except for a communication” by the provincial secretary of the Labour and Human Resources Department that sought a report from SESSI. The order said the petitioner had informed the court that a “preliminary list of t