politics
MAHA feels betrayed after Supreme Court ruling on Monsanto, glyphosate
Key takeaways
- The backlash could test the movement s ties with the Republican Party, especially after the Trump administration backed Monsanto in the case.
- Several studies have found a link between glyphosate, the main ingredient in Roundup, and cancer, including a major study from last year.
- But MAHA followers have long been alarmed by the idea, and many have grown impatient with a White House that has largely resisted their calls for tighter regulation of pesticides.
Why this matters: political developments that affect policy direction and public trust.
The backlash could test the movement s ties with the Republican Party, especially after the Trump administration backed Monsanto in the case.
Several studies have found a link between glyphosate, the main ingredient in Roundup, and cancer, including a major study from last year. Bayer and Monsanto have denied any such connection.
But MAHA followers have long been alarmed by the idea, and many have grown impatient with a White House that has largely resisted their calls for tighter regulation of pesticides.
Article preview — originally published by The Hill. Full story at the source.
Read full story on The Hill →
More top stories
Also covered by
The Guardian
‘It’s just so wrong’: Haitians in Ohio reel from supreme court TPS ruling
Al Jazeera
Advocates warn of wide-ranging implications of US Supreme Court TPS ruling
STAT News
Opinion: Supreme Court ruling on Roundup points to a confusing difference between the law and science
The Guardian
US reporter urges supreme court to halt ruling forcing her to reveal sources or pay $800-a-day fine
Aggregated and edited by the Scoop newsroom. We surface news from The Hill alongside other reporting so you can compare coverage in one place.
Editorial policy · Corrections · About Scoop