politics
Redistricting ruling roils Supreme Court with corruption, bias claims
Key takeaways
- Or are there only one or two Supreme Court justices behind the chaos caused by the recent ruling allowing new congressional districts to be drawn even after midterm primary voting has started?
- The only question is the extent of the corruption among Supreme Court justices.
- Last week, the charges of cronyism at the high court pushed beyond whispers with the full-throated charge being made publicly in the credible voice of Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson.
Why this matters: political developments that affect policy direction and public trust.
Or are there only one or two Supreme Court justices behind the chaos caused by the recent ruling allowing new congressional districts to be drawn even after midterm primary voting has started?
Among Democrats, there is no mystery. There is talk of outright corruption. The only question is the extent of the corruption among Supreme Court justices. How many have abandoned judicial impartiality to help President Trump hold his Republican majority in the House?
Last week, the charges of cronyism at the high court pushed beyond whispers with the full-throated charge being made publicly in the credible voice of Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson.
Article preview — originally published by The Hill. Full story at the source.
Read full story on The Hill →
More top stories
Also covered by
The Guardian
Mahmoud Khalil’s attorneys to turn to US supreme court after ruling paves way for deportation
The Hindu
What did the Supreme Court say about bail under UAPA?
Hacker News
When (if ever) it's appropriate to make jokes before the US Supreme Court
Inside Climate News
The Brazilian Supreme Court Makes Way for the ‘Grain Train’
Aggregated and edited by the Scoop newsroom. We surface news from The Hill alongside other reporting so you can compare coverage in one place.
Editorial policy · Corrections · About Scoop