Supreme Court upholds SIR exercise as an advancement towards free and fair elections

Subscribed with another email? Logout and Login with that one. Account subscription benefits alongside Premium Stories, Editorials, Opinions and more. Unlock these with Subscription The View From India Looking at World Affairs from the Indian perspective. First Day First Show News and reviews from the world of cinema and streaming. Today's Cache Your download of the top 5 technology stories of the day. Science For All The weekly newsletter from science writers takes the jargon out of science and puts the fun in! Data Point Decoding the headlines with facts, figures, and numbers THEdge At the cutting edge of education and careers Health Matters Ramya Kannan writes to you on getting to good health, and staying there Gender Agenda Stories from beyond the binary. The Hindu On Books Books of the week, reviews, excerpts, new titles and features. Updated - May 27, 2026 12:52 pm IST - NEW DELHI A Booth Level Officer (BLO) checks documents during the Special Intensive Revision to electoral rolls at Jogbani, a municipal council area of Araria District in Bihar. File | Photo Credit: Shashi Shekhar Kashyap The Supreme Court on Wednesday (May 27, 2026) upheld the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls as an exercise done by the Election Commission of India (ECI) in furtherance of the Constitutional principle of free and fair elections. A Bench headed by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant dismissed the petitioners’ view that SIR was a surreptitious, backdoor move to conduct citizenship screening in the name of cleaning up the electoral roll off aliens. Bihar SIR Supreme Court hearing updates - May 27, 2026 The petitions had accused the ECI of arbitrarily assuming powers to “determine citizenship” while overriding limitations clearly prescribed in parliamentary laws, rules and its own manual without providing “any good reason”. The Supreme Court judgment upholding the constitutionality of the Bihar SIR would have an impact on further rounds of SIR. The second phase of the SIR, covering 51 crore voters in 12 States and Union Territories — including in West Bengal, Tamil Nadu and Assam — had commenced even as the Bihar challenge was pending in the Supreme Court. The judgment pronounced by the Chief Justice in open court on Wednesday (May 27) said the ECI was empowered under Article 324 of the Constitution to examine citizenship to verify inclusion in the electoral roll. This verification was not the final word on the citizenship of a person. The ECI, if it finds that a person did not have the necessary documents and did not pass the enquiry, could forward the case to the competent authorities in the Central government for adjudication under the Citizenship Act. The court said SIR, though it stretched the modalities of electoral roll revision under the Representation of the People Act and the Registration of Electors Rules, cannot be invalidated. It was done in an exigency but was not “manifestly excessive”. The procedural safeguards of revision were complied with. The court rejected the arguments raised by the petitioners, including the Association for Democratic Reforms, represented by advocates Prashant Bhushan and Neha Rathi, that SIR ipso facto reversed the burden of proof of citizenship on the voters. The court said the variety of indicative documents, including Aadhaar, was a reasonable demand and part of a structured regime devised for verifying voters. The court reiterated that SIR must continue to maintain a calibrated balance in the choice of indicative documents. The Bihar SIR hearings had seen the Supreme Court effectively intervene to make the massive exercise more inclusive. One of the effective judicial interventions was to include Aadhaar as the 12th in the list of 11 ‘indicative’ documents that voters could file as proof of their identity or residence. The judgment said any decision taken during the SIR was subject to judicial review. The Bihar SIR hearings had seen the court remind the ECI that “the degree of transparency and access to information form the hallmarks of an open democracy”. The apex court had pushed the poll body to publish the names and details of voters added to the final electoral roll in the Bihar SIR. The final list in Bihar had shown the total tally of eligible voters in the State as 7.42 crore. The court had directed the Election Commission to publish a district-wise, booth-level searchable list of the nearly 65 lakh voters who were purged from the draft roll along with the exact reasons for their deletion from the list. court / Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls / election / Bihar Copyright© 2026, THG PUBLISHING PVT LTD. or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. Terms & conditions | Institutional Subscriber Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments. We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are alre

Supreme Court upholds SIR exercise as an advancement towards free and fair elections

Key takeaways

Also covered by

Supreme Court upholds SIR exercise as an advancement towards free and fair elections

Key takeaways

Also covered by

More in international