business
Anti-trafficking group says Clarity Act's Section 604 could weaken accountability
Key takeaways
- The debate: Rettig argued Section 604 reflects longstanding U.S. anti-money laundering policy rather than creating a new legal shield.
- Reading between the lines: The disagreement centers on whether lawmakers should regulate based on current technology or potential future abuses.
- What comes next: Both sides agreed stronger enforcement against human trafficking remains important, even as they disagreed on the bill's language.
The debate: Rettig argued Section 604 reflects longstanding U.S. anti-money laundering policy rather than creating a new legal shield.
Reading between the lines: The disagreement centers on whether lawmakers should regulate based on current technology or potential future abuses.
What comes next: Both sides agreed stronger enforcement against human trafficking remains important, even as they disagreed on the bill's language.
Article preview — originally published by CoinDesk. Full story at the source.
Read full story on CoinDesk →
More top stories
Aggregated and edited by the Scoop newsroom. We surface news from CoinDesk alongside other reporting so you can compare coverage in one place.
Editorial policy · Corrections · About Scoop