“Evidence” on Iranian nuclear weapons is about as reliable as Trump himself
Key takeaways
- Director of National Intelligence told Congress just two months ago that U.S. intelligence agencies had concluded Iran was not building nuclear weapons.
- His claim that Iran would have had a nuclear weapon within two weeks to four weeks had been his justification, however improbable, for attacking Iran on Feb. 28.
- When Trump started up again last week, saying Iran has a maximum of two weeks to sign a deal on its nuclear activities or else he restarts his war, Gabbard backed his lies.
Why this matters: an international story with cross-border implications worth tracking.
Director of National Intelligence told Congress just two months ago that U.S. intelligence agencies had concluded Iran was not building nuclear weapons. Indeed, she said, experts also determined Iran had not resumed its suspended 2003 nuclear weapons program.
However, U.S. President Donald Trump said she was wrong. His claim that Iran would have had a nuclear weapon within two weeks to four weeks had been his justification, however improbable, for attacking Iran on Feb. 28. Gabbard went silent.
When Trump started up again last week, saying Iran has a maximum of two weeks to sign a deal on its nuclear activities or else he restarts his war, Gabbard backed his lies. Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months. she said. She s loyal to the end, but this is so stupid it s insulting.