Scoopfeeds — Intelligent news, curated.
SC orders Adiala superintendent, other officials to submit replies on denial of access to Imran
pakistan

SC orders Adiala superintendent, other officials to submit replies on denial of access to Imran

Dawn News · Jun 18, 2026, 2:06 PM

Why this matters: local context for readers following news across Pakistan and the region.

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court (SC) on Thursday ordered the Adiala jail superintendent, Punjab’s home secretary, the Islamabad advocate general and the Punjab advocate general to furnish their replies within three weeks in a case concerning the denial of access to incarcerated PTI founder Imran Khan. A petition was filed by PTI Secretary General Salman Akram Raja, challenging the Islamabad High Court’s (IHC) October 23, 2025, dismissal of his contempt petition, which sought enforcement of the court’s directives regarding visitation rights for Imran’s legal team at Adiala jail. The directives were issued today by a three-member bench comprising Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Musarrat Hilali, and Justice Shahid Bilal Hassan. During the hearing, Justice Mazhar said the bench would not be available next week, but the appeal would be scheduled for hearing, directing that appeals be fixed within three weeks. The court also directed that the IHC’s order of Oct 23, 2025, be placed on record during the hearing. In his appeal filed under Article 185(3) of the Constitution, Raja contended that the IHC, while disposing of his contempt petition, relied solely on the oral assertion of the Adiala jail superintendent regarding alleged compliance with previous judicial directions. The appeal contended that the high court failed to call for the relevant record or verify from jail authorities the implementation of earlier directions and standard operating procedures (SOPs) for arranging regular meetings with the former premier at Adiala jail. “This constitutes a miscarriage of justice and a failure to exercise constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution,” the petition contended. The petition further contended that the IHC failed to appreciate that its own judgment of March 24, 2025, had laid down clear and unambiguous directions regarding visitation rights of the PTI founding chairman with his legal team and nominated coordinators, and that the executive auth

Article preview — originally published by Dawn News. Full story at the source.
Read full story on Dawn News → More top stories
Aggregated and edited by the Scoop newsroom. We surface news from Dawn News alongside other reporting so you can compare coverage in one place. Editorial policy · Corrections · About Scoop