No war but no peace

EXPECTATIONS that a peace deal between the United States and Iran might be finalized before the China visit of President Donald Trump have not materialized as status quo prevails over differences on key issues, especially the nuclear programme of Iran. This became evident from the remarks the US leader made before his departure for China who said that preventing Tehran from acquiring a nuclear weapon was his top priority. He also told reporters that Iran is “very much under control”, adding that Washington will either reach a deal or the country will face destruction. The delay in sorting out differences is understandable because of the complexities of the issues involved and attempts of the two sides to turn the diplomatic process into a victory for them. However, it is also encouraging that both the countries are demonstrating patience and not indulging in extreme actions that could trigger resumption of the war. The truce, by and large, prevails, which is reflective of the phenomenon of no war but no peace. It is also important to note that the United States and Iran have positive expectations from the diplomatic efforts being made by Pakistan to encourage the two sides to move towards a permanent resolution of the conflict. This was highlighted by the answer the US President gave to a questioner who wanted to know whether he was reconsidering Pakistan’s role as mediator. The President firmly stated “No, they are great. The field marshal and the prime minister of Pakistan have been absolutely great.” On the other hand, Iran has insisted that it will not return to the negotiating table unless five trust-building conditions are fulfilled, which include “ending the war on all fronts, especially Lebanon”, lifting sanctions, releasing frozen Iranian assets, compensating for war damages and recognizing Iran’s sovereignty rights over the Strait of Hormuz. Absence of nuclear issue from five minimum demands means Tehran was ready to show flexibility on this agenda item.